On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:36:00AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 09:48 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, we also don't need threads.
> > I am glad that you also agree on that. Please, now try fixing
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7525
> >
> Well, I can't resist a challenge....
Funny that you felt challenged...
> The attached patch fixes the reported problem. I'm not sure it's the
> right thing to do, though.
Maybe the right thing to do is to update the macros at cloning time.
See attached.
--
Enrico
Index: src/Buffer.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/Buffer.cpp (revisione 38579)
+++ src/Buffer.cpp (copia locale)
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ Buffer * Buffer::clone() const
buffer_clone->setChild(dit, child_clone);
}
buffer_clone->d->macro_lock = false;
+ buffer_clone->updateMacros();
return buffer_clone;
}
