On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:54:07PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 05/10/2011 08:21 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: > >On 10.05.2011 19:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>Le 10/05/11 19:29, Peter Kümmel a écrit : > >>>The idea was not to pollute the src dirs because much more than > >>>CMakeLists.txt > >>>is needed. But I think we could move the CMakeLists.txt into the source > >>>dirs and > >>>all other files in development/cmake. > >> > >>Or even in ./cmake (and ./config could be renamed to ./autotools). > >> > >>I like this idea. > >> > >>JMarc > >> > > > >Currently our directory looks a bit inconsistent: we have boost, > >intl, and src > >with code. m4, config, and development with build stuff. lib and > >po with ui things. > > > >Shouldn't we cleanup this? We could also split development: > > > >boost and intl is not our code, but it is source code -> > > src/3rdparty/boost > > src/3rdparty/intl > > Actually, I would propose a flat hierarchy: > > > src/lyx/ : basically one C++ file with main() using the other > libraries below or not > > src/boost/ > > src/intl/ > > src/core/ : > everything that is now in src/. Some of that may go in new > src/export/ and src/import/ directories. > > src/gui/ : > everything that is now in > src/frontents/ > src/frontents/qt4 > src/frontents/qt4/ui > src/graphics/ (mostly) > > src/support/ : same as now > src/insets/ : same as now plus a bit of what is now in src/graphics > src/mathed/ : same as now > src/tex2lyx/ : same as now. Most of that may go in new src/import/ > directory. > src/client/ : same as now > > This way we would have one directory per program or library.
Sorry, but I really don't see the need for a reorganization that will destabilize things and will cause people to fix problems that would have never emerged. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:If_it_ain%27t_broke,_don%27t_fix_it -- Enrico
