Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 11.05.2011 20:19, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Side notes: >>> 1: we should really get rid of boost source. >>> 2: we should really get rid of boost using code >> >> whats your solution the problems with tr1::regexp in gcc discussed last >> time? > > We could switch to QRegEx. But it's not a 100% drop it.
was it the only hindrance for dropping boost? iirc there were some issues with older msvc compilers, but thats 3 years back... pavel
