>>> i just propose that its not compulsory to use (new) branch for each small >>> thingie. >>> bigger things will have their branch and that would be the advantage you >>> deny. >> >> What problem do you have with a new branch for every thingie ? I haven't >> heard an argument why this would be so much more annoying ? > > i must have hundreds of commits which in background looks like that: > doing some lyx completely unrelated work and see a glitch. well, i jump > in new console, grep&jump to the file, fix the thingie, write "typo" in commit > message and commit it (1 not 2 actions in my counting). because i do this > almost mechanically and in a few seconds it doesn't distract my other work too > much. i dont want to trigger train of thoughts "where it should go, what > should > be the name of the new branch, do i have already week-old branch where this > could > be added". frankly after one minute i dont want even to remember i have ever > committed it :) >
I give up if this discussion is only about typo-correction commits. Vincent
