> > > i must have hundreds of commits which in background looks like that: > doing some lyx completely unrelated work and see a glitch. well, i jump > in new console, grep&jump to the file, fix the thingie, write "typo" in > commit > message and commit it (1 not 2 actions in my counting). because i do this > almost mechanically and in a few seconds it doesn't distract my other work > too > much. i dont want to trigger train of thoughts "where it should go, what > should > be the name of the new branch, do i have already week-old branch where this > could > be added". frankly after one minute i dont want even to remember i have > ever > committed it :) > > i can live with some glitch branch if you want all this stuff merged in one > commit > in a longer time window and are annoyed by this movement in > development-trunk. but it > looks absurd to spend equal time on thinking about proper branching and > fixing the > glitch. > > pavel >
By the way, there is nothing against to have a feature: "sanda/typos-and-cosmetics" in which you can commit all unrelated glitches. Vincent
