>>>>> "John" == John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:33:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes John> wrote: >> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: | | > Gentlemen, | > | > >> I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a >> little | > cumbersome to use: >> I really do not want it done this way... John> I agree 100%! This is *not* appropriate for documentation... Why? JMarc
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Miyata Shigeru
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Amir Karger
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... mike . ressler