On 12 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Plus, it excludes one set of default bindings (e.g. Emacs) in favor of > | another (e.g. CUA). We need to document *all* bindings, and the place > | for that is in the Reference Manual. > > I must admit that I'd like an apendix a lot better. Give me a chance to get everything written up. When I'm finished, we can play the appendix vs no appendix game and see how things look. I'm actually beginning to agree more with John on this one, but I'd like to see them in action first. My worry about the Reference Manual is that the keybinding section is likely to be the ONLY section that isn't completely out of date. Mike -- Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... mike . ressler
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Garst R. Reese
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Amir Karger
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma - ... mike . ressler
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Amir Karger
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... mike . ressler
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lior Silberman
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma John Weiss