On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:03 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > No, it is not. Adding some basic support (#0) like we have with other > RCS > is one weekend work and you'll spend more time on testing than coding. > > Some folks spoke about more fancy git support - in particular > #1) use git for bundled format > #2) use (some of) git codebase instead of relying on external calls > we use for rcs/cvs/svn.
Yes, I've read the discussion about git. The problem on when to git-push emerged, but honestly I think that adding a dedicated command/button/menu item is much easier than all the other options like commit+push or just commit. However I may miss something. About #2, if I'm correct the question was just about knowing if the file is part of a git repo since we don't want to spawn a process each time a document is open. In the case we'd have to check "./.git", and "../.git", and "../../.git". I know this may be a problem in certain situations, but that's what git-status does, so we don't have much alternative. I'll try to implement it, do you think it may be included in a release before April? In any case considering also the delay of the distro packagers I find hard I can do it in time for the conference. Ale
