Alessandro Di Federico <[email protected]> writes:
| On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:03 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> No, it is not. Adding some basic support (#0) like we have with other
>> RCS
>> is one weekend work and you'll spend more time on testing than coding.
>>
>> Some folks spoke about more fancy git support - in particular
>> #1) use git for bundled format
>> #2) use (some of) git codebase instead of relying on external calls
>> we use for rcs/cvs/svn.
>
| Yes, I've read the discussion about git. The problem on when to git-push
| emerged, but honestly I think that adding a dedicated
| command/button/menu item is much easier than all the other options like
| commit+push or just commit. However I may miss something.
>
| About #2, if I'm correct the question was just about knowing if the file
| is part of a git repo since we don't want to spawn a process each time a
| document is open. In the case we'd have to check "./.git", and
| "../.git", and "../../.git". I know this may be a problem in certain
| situations, but that's what git-status does, so we don't have much
| alternative.
I really think that calling "git status" or a similar command is
perfectly ok, and while we wait for libgit to emerge, also the right
thing to do.
--
Lgb
