Liviu Andronic wrote: > With latest trunk I can no longer replicate this problem. But I think > I spotted a further issue with the layout arguments: > - The user can insert two identical argument insets in the same parent > inset.
Fixed. > Optionally, can it make sure that the argument inset > is placed on the 1st line of the parent inset, at the beginning of the > line? > > This might be going to far, but I thought that for multipar=true > insets it might be nicer UI to have a "virtual" first line reserved > for arguments, where arguments cannot be mixed with text. Currently > one can place an argument inset in the middle of a phrase; although > the LaTeX code will be generated correctly, UI-wise it's a bit ugly. > Thus even if the right-click c-menu is triggered in the middle of the > 4th line, the 'Chunk Options' would still get placed on the reserved > 1st "virtual" line of the 'Sweave Chunk' inset. But again, this is > cosmetics. This is the price you have to pay for the inset approach. Trying to set insets to a certain position gets you all sorts of trouble, see the big woes we have with InsetBibitem. The better UI, as I have argued many times, would be a dialog. But then, dialogs do not provide a real workarea. Jürgen
