Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > The first name is the LFUN_ version, normalized to look like the text > > versiopn. Shall we rename the enums to match the function names or do > > the opposite? Or do nothing? > > I'd say go for the first option. renaming the function names is not a good > idea, since those might be in use, and consistency is certainly good.
Yep, I wouldn't change the names for the sake of users who alredy use those lfuns. BTW beware that there are LFUNs without names. Pavel
