On 11/03/2014 1:42 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/03/14 10:43, Rainer M Krug a écrit :
Just an observation from somebody not involved:
The conversion route should be taking quality loss in consideration,
i.e. a conversion path which only involves lossless conversions, even if
it is longer, should be preferred.
We already have a "vector" flag that serves this purpose, but we could
maybe improve on that.
JMarc
I am not sure if we use this information. Last time I looked we selected
a shorter conversion path over a longer, fully vectorial one.
--
Julien
