Richard Heck wrote: > I'm inclined to agree. It would mean re-packaging for everyone, but it > shouldn't be too bad. Other opinions?
We should have 2.0.8.1 (or 2.0.9), 2.0.8 packages are already in the wild. Pavel
Richard Heck wrote: > I'm inclined to agree. It would mean re-packaging for everyone, but it > shouldn't be too bad. Other opinions?
We should have 2.0.8.1 (or 2.0.9), 2.0.8 packages are already in the wild. Pavel