On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> wrote:
> Cyrille Artho <c.ar...@aist.go.jp> writes:
>
>> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>> <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote:
>>>> 22/05/2014 08:09, Cyrille Artho:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Scott, Thanks for your work in keeping the packages working. I'm
>>>>> still using foils (foiltex) so I'm very happy if it can be kept
>>>>> working for a long time. In fact, I was not aware that it is no
>>>>> longer maintained. That's too bad because I think I'm not the only
>>>>> one who still uses it.
>>>>>
>>>>> In my personal opinion, beamer uses too many boxes and does not look
>>>>> good if you use a lot of figures/images on the slides. Beamer slides
>>>>> may look better for text-only slides but those slides are boring to
>>>>> begin with ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I depend on foils to. I tried beamer for my last presentation
>>>> (because I needed its slide animation features), but I really did not
>>>> like it. Too much bling for my taste.
>>>>
>>> I also have issues with all the bling that comes with Beamer by
>>> default, but with some few Beamer config tweaks all the bling can be
>>> toned down significantly. This is why I came up with a series of
>>> "simple" Beamer examples on the wiki:
>>> http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/Beamer
>
> I just wanted to take a look at them, and all produce an error when
> opening from LyX (LyX Version 2.1.0 (13 Apr 2014)) on a Mac.
>
> ,----
> | 
> /var/folders/50/wcr5bjwn75q595n6x82gxj280000gn/T/lyx_tmpdir.twUHvMRS5559/Buffer_convertLyXFormatXXXXXX.lyx.kSameUIi5559
> | ended unexpectedly, which means that it is probably corrupted.
> `----
>
> I though that the conversion by lyx2lyx is the problem, but that one
> works without problems.
>
> I attach the converted file (from [1]).
>
> Ironically, all non-simple beamer presentations open without
> error... conspiracy? :-)
>
I'm not sure. Maybe it is related to the recently discovered issues in
lyx2lyx with more complex Beamer documents.

Liviu


> Cheers,
>
> Rainer
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Most changes are obtained very easily via simple Beamer calls in the
>>> Preamble.
>>>
>>> Liviu
>>>
>>>
>>>> OTOH, I reckon that foilTeX slides can be a bit ugly, and I'd welcome
>>>> another option.
>>>>
>>>> JMarc
>>>>
>> Hi Liviu,
>> Thanks for the links. IMHO even the "simple" style is rather heavyweight
>> for the boxes (with shadows etc.). I think the trend is now towards
>> cleaner, simpler layouts with no 3 D effects, and only as few
>> lines/boxes/frames/background colors as absolutely needed.
>> In that sense, what was done by necessity 15 years ago when doing slides in
>> LyX/TeX is now again in fashion ;-)
>>
>> Why FoilTeX works for me (sorry if this is getting off-topic):
>>
>> For my own slides, I change the bullet symbol and title color in FoilTeX
>> but otherwise use it without changes. Whenever possible, I avoid bullet
>> lists in the first place but of course I don't always have enough time to
>> get rid of enumerations. I never use "striptease slides" as the audience
>> tends to squint, trying to read the grey text on white, while not listening
>> to the speaker. IMHO if you use a "striptease slide", then you have failed
>> in the design and should create 2 - 3 separate (but incremental) slides
>> instead. Note that these may repeat a figure (with modifications) but
>> should not repeat the entire text as you'd otherwise again end up with a
>> wall of text.
>>
>> In short, beamer can make a wall of text look relatively pretty, and
>> this may work for a couple of minutes, but after that one realizes
>> again that walls of text are not suitable for presentations. Without
>> that, the most compelling features of beamer are not needed anymore.
>
>
> Footnotes:
> [1]  http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Examples/Beamer/Liv/beamer-simple.lyx
>
> --
> Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, 
> UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
>
> Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
> Stellenbosch University
> South Africa
>
> Tel :       +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
> Cell:       +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
> Fax :       +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
>
> Fax (D):    +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
>
> email:      rai...@krugs.de
>
> Skype:      RMkrug
>
> PGP: 0x0F52F982
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Reply via email to