On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:44:01PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > >> > Hence, the right fix is defining \@doi through the \doi macro. >> > ATM, the layout does not offer any way to do that and one has to insert >> > this info in the preamble. A finer fix would be defining a DOI layout as >> > done, for example, for CopyrightYear, Copyrightdata, and so on. >> >> Thanks for looking into this, Enrico. I added your suggested fix at 34eadf5d. > > However, I wonder what happens if one exports to a previous LyX format. > Maybe some reversion routine converting the DOI layout to ERT has to be > added to lyx_2_2.py? Or, maybe better, simply add a DOI layout definition > to the local layout? Hmm... in this last case we would also need to remove > the local DOI layout when reloading with 2.2. I'm sorry, but the finer > solution seems also to be the most troublesome one...
Ah good point, I did not think of this. I unfortunately do not know Python (this is on my TODO list to learn) so I could not work on the lyx_2_2.py. Unless someone else is interested in working on the lyx_2_2.py, I guess the only solution is to move the DOI directly to the local layout; or use ERT. Scott
