Le 30/11/2015 01:15, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Guillaume Munch wrote:
You describe a method for this, above, but to me it sounds like a
cumbersome way to force-record the state of an inset (for instance, it
I agree it is cumbersome, my reasoning was that I would rather impose this
complexity on user who is using git & CT than complicating anything for user
who just uses CT.
We could leave this aside for the moment no? Are you afraid that it
would cast the situation in stone and somebody who comes up with a good
solution won't be able to implement it anymore?
By the way, I forgot the step 1.5) "do a dummy modification" between 1)
"save" and 2) "revert", so it's really a 7-step process.
