On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:03:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: > > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org > > >> > > >> JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else? > > > > > > Unfortunately I do not know much about this origin business. My > > > comment was about the fact that hardcoding the origin at install time > > > feel wrong and I proposed an alternate solution. For later of course. > > > > I'm afraid I'm in the same boat. Enrico may be the only other person who > > really understands it. > > That would be really unfortunate, but I think that at least Georg understands > it. > Anyway, I agree with whatever is decided and, FWIW, he has a +1 from me. > I have to say that I regret having introduced that parameter.
Just to make it clear, a +1 is worth a lot. It means "commit". Our current policy is that a developer who posts a patch and gets a "+1" can commit to master. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
