Am 12. Januar 2016 20:24:38 MEZ, schrieb Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de>: >Am 12.01.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> I did this now as I wrote in the >> Questions for Uwe once you are back >> thread. >> I had to delete CMake's cache first and re-run it from scratch. The >> 3rd party programs are compiled (with 134 warnings) but I don't get a > >> DLL. Is this the plan - not to rely anymore on DLLs? >> >Almost. The libs are currently compiled as static libraries. But this >is >not the most important aspect. The main goal of having these sources >included with LyX is that no externally compiled prerequisites are >needed anymore (except for qt). This has two advantages: > >1) It makes it more easy for other people to build LyX on windows, even > >if they have a different compiler than you. I hope that this will >attract other people who build on windows in the long term, so that you > >do not need to do everything alone. > >2) It eliminates all possibillities of errors that may occur because of > >different compilers. This makes it more easy for you to switch to a new > >MSVC version.
But Atm all msvc > 2010 versions are broken. So the only way to go is mingw or 2010. > >If it turns out that for some reason having one of these thirdparty >libraries as dll has advantages, we could also change the build >procedure to produce dlls from the same sources. > > >Georg
