Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf >> Author: Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> >> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 >> >> New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs >> >> Simply run updatedocs.py >> >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> index a529a0a..ff4068a 100644 >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> -# gen_lfuns.py generated this file. For more info see >> http://www.lyx.org/ -\lyxformat 504 >> +#LyX 2.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ >> +\lyxformat 506 > > (note: the comments below are more about 51d4036d than this commit but > it is more convenient to discuss them here) > > Is the above diff expected?
Yes, since gen_lfuns.py produces format 504. If it would produce the current format then this diff would not appear. What is missing here is a python library for producing .lyx files in current format which is part of lyx2lyx, so that scripts like gen_lfuns.py do not need to be adapted to ner versions. > From what I understand, as of 51d4036d, > updatedocs.py now handles LFUNs.lyx appropriately, which is nice. But do > we want the header to say that "LyX 2.2 created this file" or do we still > want to say that "gen_lfuns.py generated this file" ? The latter. Georg
