On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:53:34PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf > >> Author: Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> > >> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 > >> > >> New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs > >> > >> Simply run updatedocs.py > >> > >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> index a529a0a..ff4068a 100644 > >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > >> -# gen_lfuns.py generated this file. For more info see > >> http://www.lyx.org/ -\lyxformat 504 > >> +#LyX 2.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ > >> +\lyxformat 506 > > > > (note: the comments below are more about 51d4036d than this commit but > > it is more convenient to discuss them here) > > > > Is the above diff expected? > > Yes, since gen_lfuns.py produces format 504. If it would produce the current > format then this diff would not appear. What is missing here is a python > library for producing .lyx files in current format which is part of lyx2lyx, > so that scripts like gen_lfuns.py do not need to be adapted to ner versions.
I see. I was more curious about the "LyX 2.2 created this file" addition, which you address below. > > From what I understand, as of 51d4036d, > > updatedocs.py now handles LFUNs.lyx appropriately, which is nice. But do > > we want the header to say that "LyX 2.2 created this file" or do we still > > want to say that "gen_lfuns.py generated this file" ? > > The latter. OK, thanks. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
