On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:41:47PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > José? Can you review and test this patch before Monday? If you do so, > please give an explicit +1 if you support the inclusion of it for 2.2.0.
I think that you should take the responsibility of making a decision. The worst that may happen is that a parbreak separator is not converted to the new latexpar kind. But they are perfectly equivalent and it is only their representation that changes on screen. BTW, the patch does not apply cleanly anymore. -- Enrico
