On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> > > On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > <lasgout...@lyx.org> > > >> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > >>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > >>> <lasgout...@lyx.org> > > >>>> commit 6a1803e18dfac1720920a4fc8c500300658bc7d7 > > >>>> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> > > >>>> Date: Wed Feb 3 10:37:29 2016 +0100 > > >>>> > > >>>> Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views > > >>> May I ask why this (and other) commit goes to 2.2.2-staging? When will > > >>> it make into 2.3-staging? > > >>> I thought, that new things go first to later versions and will > > >>> eventually be backported. > > >> I put it there yesterday at b31a9937d. > > >> > > >> JMarc > > > It is too easy to lose track ATM. Something like 'backported from' or > > > 'cherry picked from' in the commit message would be helpful. At least > > > for me. > > > > Note that nothing goes to 2.2.x-staging that is not in 2.3-staging. This > > is the same as usual procedure: Commit to master, then ask if it's ok to > > commit to 2.1.x. It's just that 2.3-staging is playing the role of > > master now and 2.2.x-staging is playing the role of 2.1.x. > > I understood it from your other mail. BUT if 2.3-staging is playing the > role of master, why not use master > and get rid of this 2.3-staging? What is the role of master now? Being closed > (which it is not because there are > commits! E.g. c46d5cc) is not very satisfying.
The role of master is 2.2.0. It is not 100% closed (if it were then 2.2.0 would be released). It is open for critical patches. This is just a temporary situation. Once 2.2.0 is released, we will back to normal. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
