On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:02:25PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > Yet for me a browser is a read-only process where I am a consumer > while with > lyx is a write process where I am a producer/maker. That is to say > that > mentally that analogy is not obvious. I would not expect for lyx to > behave > like a browser.
I agree that the analogy is not a perfect one and the differences are important. But I think for some things the analogy is close enough. For example: GNOME Terminal, Nautilus, and Chromium are quite different applications, but ctrl+page-up cycles through tabs on all three. > I want to reinforce your analysis that it is not intuitive to open an > included > file opening the inset. Actually now that I think of it the file is > also > available through View->Hidden but in this context that operation is > also > cumbersome. True, and another possibility to make things easier would be to put the cursor before the inset and use a keyboard shortcut. But I actually find right-clicking and going to edit to be the easiest of the current alternatives. In any case, I do not plan to proceed. There doesn't seem to be much excitement. And even for the middle-click close of a tab there was some resistance (on lyx-users). I think there would be even more resistance for this. > This is IMHO, of course. :-) Mine is only IMO :) Thanks for the feedback, José. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
