On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:34:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > commit 2306fca65961f2b25eb8c86ae0c8824582f74cc2 > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[email protected]> > Date: Mon Jul 18 14:34:08 2016 +0200 > > Some things did not need to be mutable after all
I'm curious, is there any situation where if the mutable keyword is removed and compilation succeeds we want to keep the mutable keyword? I suppose only if we want to allow for future const member functions to modify the data member? Is that a common situation? Not that I'm planning to actually do it, but would a script that removes a mutable keyword and then tests whether compilation succeeds be interesting? e.g. something like we did for headers at #6305. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
