Le 10 août 2016 22:55:51 UTC+02:00, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> a écrit : >I'm curious, is there any situation where if the mutable keyword is >removed and compilation succeeds we want to keep the mutable keyword? I >suppose only if we want to allow for future const member functions to >modify the data member? Is that a common situation? > >Not that I'm planning to actually do it, but would a script that >removes >a mutable keyword and then tests whether compilation succeeds be >interesting? e.g. something like we did for headers at #6305. > >Scott
I think that when it compiles it's ok. But a script will probably not yield much from what I saw at the time. JMarc
