Am Dienstag, 4. April 2017 um 23:14:22, schrieb José Abílio Matos <jama...@lyx.org> > On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21.43.58 WEST Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Hi José, > > > > many thanks for having a look. > > > > Why CMake 2.6? That was released 9 years (sic!) ago. Using it is a > > potential security issue. i am wondering if people still use this. > > > > In my opinion we should rely on CMake 2.8, released 7 years ago > > > > I also think we should only need to support Python 2.7 for the same > > reason. Python 2.6 was also released 9 years ago, Python 2.7 was > > released 7 years ago. This is already a lot of time. > > I am sorry what I meant is that cmake checks for python >= 2.6.
ATM cmake(lyx) checks for python >= 2.7.
> Or at least that in development/LyXPackaging.cmake we can find the following
> lines:
>
> # We depend on python scripting
> set(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS "python (>= 2.6)")
This is valid for cpack routines only. Used for installations through the
debian package manager.
> Regards,
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
