Le 10/04/2017 à 11:49, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
FWIW, IMHO it all comes to:

What is the event that we think is relevant to jump to the 3.x series?

If none then the first number in the 2.x.y moniker is irrelevant and it should
be dropped.

I agree with what you write, but it does not seem important enough to me to actually act on it :)

Either way, I do not really care. The only numbering that makes a real difference to me is Year.Month, but it is not adapted to our workflow.

JMarc

Reply via email to