On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > El 10.04.2017 a las 09:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió: > > > I have not followed the recent Qt development, but I find it depressing > > that we have to use the latst and greatest because anything older has > > significant issues. I would expect LTS to be a safe, conservative > > choice, but I may be wrong. > > My experience with Qt is that .0 releases often had bugs. Therefore I waited > for 4.8.1 etc. I also see that bugs are often not fixed for older releases. > With the LTS versions QT went another way. Now they try to backport the > major bugfixes. > > Therefore I would like to use the latest Qt LTS version. This is still > version 5.6 (just a year old). They plan to release a new bugfix version of > 5.6 soon.
OK 5.6 sounds like a good and safe idea. Unless we know of bugs (I don't) that affect LyX that are fixed, we can stick with that. Thanks for the comments, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
