On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > As we're on this, a few other things I had in my tommaso/master [1], out of > which: > I'd really love to have 3)...
Is it polished? Is there a trac ticket for this one? Or an archived discussion? > about 2) I'm stuck with recurring to Emacs-editing the first line of a .lyx > file every time I face that issue :-)... If I remember correctly, this is the idea that LyX might as well try to open files from future LyX versions, if the author accepts the consequences. Is that right? If so, I think I will be hesitant to accept this one at this point. I think it will need discussion and will need to consider several possible situations. But if you feel strongly about it, continue the discussion on lyx-devel. Who knows---maybe I'm wrong and we could arrive at a consensus soon enough to put it in before the freeze. > just pushed 1),.... needs to be tried by someone I tried it, just found a minor unexpected behavior that I reported in the thread. > guess 4) might be debatable already for a 3.0 :-). Yes probably we should hold off on that one. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
