On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:35:48AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 04/05/2017 11:53, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > as a consequence, I came up with the attached patch that solves the > > pushed that anyway -- even if copying with images and their conversion is > desired, we shouldn't need dryrun then, should we ?
From the definition of dryrun it looks like we shouldn't generate images: /** whether or not to do actual file copying and image conversion * This mode will be used to preview the source code */ So if file copying and image conversion is the only thing that prepareHTMLFile does, then I think your patch is correct. I did not check.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
