Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 18:43:34 CEST schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien 
<[email protected]>:
> Le 12/06/2018 à 18:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
> > Am Dienstag, den 12.06.2018, 17:32 +0200 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
> >> Le 12/06/2018 à 15:02, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hm, simply changing 'aastex6' to 'aastex62' does not help, because
> >>> now we have
> >>> the next error:
> >>>
> >>> ! Class revtex4-1 Error: \and is not supported.
> >>
> >> Looks like a compatibility problem between aastex62.cls and revtex4
> >> which did
> >> not appear with aastex6.cls,
> > 
> > Which is another argument for adding a separate aastex62.layout and
> > keeping aastex6.layout (in obsolete eventually). This is most probably
> > also the reason they renamed the class.
> 
> Sure.
> I was wrong in my previous mail, \slugcomment masked the real error, which 
> stems 
> from the fact that \and is deprecated in aastex62.tex:
> 
> <cite sample62.tex>
> %% Note that the \and command from previous versions of AASTeX is now
> %% depreciated in this version as it is no longer necessary. AASTeX
> %% automatically takes care of all commas and "and"s between authors names.
> </cite>
> 
> We should remove the 'And' style in the aastex62.layout file (which will call 
> the aastex.layout file).
> 
> Ans solving the issue in aas_sample.lyx is straightforward.
> 
> But should not we keep aas6_sample.lyx and aas62_sample.lyx, as well as
> aastex6.lyx and aastex62.lyx in the templates dir ?
> 6 in TL17 and 62 in TL18 are exclusive.
> 

Could we create a aastex layout which is independent of the aastex version?
(Preferably maybe with help of \IfFileExists{filename}?)

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to