John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 17 Apr 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote: | | > This is planned, except that wchar_t is 32 bit on most os's. | | Wouldn't this have an enormous space impact on those of us who don't | need it ? enormous? no I don't think so. Try to set LyXParagraph::value_type to int and see how large impact is has. | I thought the point of UTF-8 was that ASCII could be stored in 7-bit | values ? yes, but we do not really want to use utf-8 internally. -- Lgb
- Unicode (was Re: enormous) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Unicode (was Re: enormous) John Weiss
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Dekel Tsur
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) John Weiss
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Andre Poenitz
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormou... Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: eno... Andre Poenitz
- Re: Unicode (was Re: eno... Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unicode (was Re: enormous) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Fwd: enormous Stephen Reindl