Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:45 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt: > I see more than one problem. > > 1. The spell checker on Mac is an OS service and there is support for > document scope too. Probably this collides with our implementation in > LyX.
Why is this a problem? The implementation I have done is OS-independent and should work on the Mac, too. AppleSpellChecker really does not strike me too different from the other spellers. > 2. Document local dictionary is only one option to improve the > situation. > Imagine documents for specific context - e.g. medical or chemical > science - > there it would be better to associate the document with a dedicated > personal > dictionary and/or even share it with colleagues. How does this relate to the problem we are just talking about? The feature request I addressed was about document local dictionaries, nothing else. > 3. IMO this wasn’t a bug fix - it’s an enhancement or a new feature. I can't follow you here. Sure it is. > > Also, as you say it is marked correctly after context menu action, > > there is probably only some call missing here. > > Yes, probably. I have just looked again at AppleSpellChecker and really do not see how this is so special. Maybe you just need to debug a bit Paragraph::spellCheck() (the routine which is in if (speller- >canCheckParagraph())). Well likely just a simple oversight. Check for the return values of speller->check() gathered here. It should be LEARNED_WORD for the cases in question. Best, Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
