Am 08.03.2021 um 19:39 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>: > > Am 08.03.2021 um 19:22 schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>: >> >> Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>>>> Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly? >>>> >>>> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion - >>>> diff attached). >>> >>> 07122f066b43 and your reversion is not identical - I see several changes in >>> exception includes. >>> What happens if you actually revert 07122f066b43 verbatim? >> >> The same. :( >> Attached is the revert patch I’ve used to test. > > To come closer to the original I've moved the location of the spellignore() > retrieval (patch attached). Same exception. > > Please consider the fact that I check the spelling of the german Intro.lyx. > > The bparams.spellignore() word list should be empty and it is. > > The basic_string exception must be independent and more general.
Finally I got it. Sorry for the noise and thank you for your patience. The change 6273c1f66d fixes it. I couldn’t imagine the exception ruins the stack trace completely. Stephan -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
