* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 14:28]:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > The intention is that in the minibuffer you will not be allowed to
> | > enter "free text" strings. i.e. lfuns with arguments, but will _only_
> | > be allowed to enter the lfun. If the lfun requires an argument it will
> | > be asked for (or more than one). To do this the information we keep
> | > about each lfun must also hold the number or arguments and their type.
> | > Not hard to do, but I need some time...
> |
> | This is fine, the current lfun's do not require arguments so this
> | transitional flaw is of no concern.
>
> Several of the lfuns require arguments.
>From what I've seen there was only some help related lfun that needed
arguments, at least it was the only one who announced it in the LFUN
array.
--
Baruch Even
http://baruch.ev-en.org/
