Am Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:43:25 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org>:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:22:34AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:54:26 +0200
> > schrieb Yu Jin <technikma...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > > Alternatively you can try setting CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD directly.
> > > > Like in CMakeLists.txt:646
> > > > -if(NOT MSVC)
> > > > +if (MSVC)
> > > > + set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11)
> > > > +else()
> > > >
> > > > Since I cannot test for MSVC, it is untested.
> > > >
> > > Does not seem to do anything, the standard set in Visual Studio is still
> > > "Default
> > > (C++14)" and still the same error occurs.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry Eugene, I would try to check for diff of the used cxx parameters in
> > lyx2.3 and
> > lyx2.5 compilation. Other than that, I am out of suggestions.
>
> If we run out of ideas how to compile 2.3 with the current win compilers,
> how hard or complex patches would be backporting compilation fixes present
> in 2.4?
>
> Pavel
Looks like not so easy. The changes in are
development/cmake/modules/LyXMacros.cmake: easy managable
development/cmake/modules/FindCXX11Compiler.cmake: looks not difficult
CMakeLists.txt: Huge
If Eugene is able to compile lyx2.4 with qt5 then I'd still like to know the
differences of the used cxx parameters. Seems easier to make a patch then (at
least for
Eugene's compiler)
Kornel
pgpK8VMiGdsWO.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
