Am Fr., 19. Apr. 2024 um 11:00 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>:
> Am Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:43:25 +0200 > schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:22:34AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:54:26 +0200 > > > schrieb Yu Jin: > > > > > > > > Alternatively you can try setting CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD directly. > > > > > Like in CMakeLists.txt:646 > > > > > -if(NOT MSVC) > > > > > +if (MSVC) > > > > > + set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) > > > > > +else() > > > > > > > > > > Since I cannot test for MSVC, it is untested. > > > > > > > > > Does not seem to do anything, the standard set in Visual Studio is > still "Default > > > > (C++14)" and still the same error occurs. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry Eugene, I would try to check for diff of the used cxx parameters > in lyx2.3 and > > > lyx2.5 compilation. Other than that, I am out of suggestions. > > > > If we run out of ideas how to compile 2.3 with the current win compilers, > > how hard or complex patches would be backporting compilation fixes > present > > in 2.4? > > > > Pavel > > Looks like not so easy. The changes in are > development/cmake/modules/LyXMacros.cmake: easy managable > development/cmake/modules/FindCXX11Compiler.cmake: looks not > difficult > CMakeLists.txt: Huge > > If Eugene is able to compile lyx2.4 with qt5 Yes I am. > then I'd still like to know the > differences of the used cxx parameters. 2.4 compiles with c++20 standard. The Problem with 2.3 are the "unary_function"s, which seem to require c++11(?) and as far as I can see the current Visual Studio just can not do that, c++14 is minimum. > Seems easier to make a patch then (at least for > Eugene's compiler) -- Eugene
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
