Le 02/02/2026 à 09:31, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 01.02.2026 um 22:05 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Thank you all for the naming suggestions. I like splittable (how come
that my spell checker wants two t's?) inset. There may be something
with "flowing", but I cannot make it meaningful.
For me, splittable suggests the inset can be split into two (as with
the inset-split lfun).
For me, the crucial points are the this inset is inline (as opposed to
display and like our current inline) and keeps inline with multiple
lines (as opposed to the current inline which gets displayed)
Hence, inline-<something> strikes me most plausible
Indeed, I like "inline" too, but I am worried that it will collide with
the other notion. We will have inline insets that will not inline, if
you see what I mean.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
