I ended up pushing f13d9199, a variant of the patch that doesn't have side effects. (I had forgotten the DocBookSection parameter!)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 00:02, Thibaut Cuvelier <[email protected]> wrote: > Second attempt… > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Thibaut Cuvelier <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 at 17:48 > Subject: Springer Nature Journals layout: is this change safe? > To: LyX Developers <[email protected]> > > > Hi all, > > Following a report from Scott, I tried to improve the situation for > exporting Springer Nature Journals to DocBook. The last few patches improve > the situation quite a bit (and they should be safe to go in 2.5.x). > > There are two stubborn issues: algorithm floats and appendices. > > Unless I implement something specific to parse algorithms, the example > will never work as is (the ERT starting with \begin{algorithmic}[1]) — > there is nothing standard in DocBook for algorithms, I don't think I'll go > this route unless there is a real need. > > I wrote a patch for appendices (in attachment), but I do not want to push > without review. The current layout considers appendices as BackMatter, but > they are really section titles. With this change, the DocBook output for > appendices is correct, but I'm not sure exactly how much the change impacts > the rest of LyX (apart from the UI). Without this, I cannot make appendices > generate valid DocBook (well, unless we refactor the UI part from the > handling part of categories: sections have a really different code path > than the other styles in DocBook due to its hierarchical nature). > > What do you think? Maybe I missed something? > > Thibaut Cuvelier >
-- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
