On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 at 09:58, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 09:10:26PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > I ended up pushing f13d9199, a variant of the patch that doesn't have > side > > effects. (I had forgotten the DocBookSection parameter!) > > Great! I uninverted the test at b2e6ab84 thanks to your fix. > Just to be clear: if the test passes, it's just because the testing procedure is not very demanding. The output is valid XML (syntactically correct) but not valid DocBook (semantically correct: the figures have no content apart from comments). > The following two tests fail for me: > > > INVERTED.DOCBOOK_export/examples/Language_Support/Localization_Test_%28for_Developers%29_docbook5 > export/examples/ja/Modules/Linguistics_docbook5 > > It seems we can invert the "INVERTED" test above. i.e., that export used > to fail but now passes. I'm not sure if thanks to your fix today, or > thanks to a previous fix. If it's OK with you, I can "uninvert" this > test. > It might very well be related, as I changed a few elements in standard definitions (7d5b9d78). > I'm not sure about the Linguistics_docbook5. Maybe it started failing > due to a change in the Linguistics manual. If so, we might want to > invert this one (since it would not be a regression in DocBook). I just had a look at that document and it made LyX crash… I reworked a bit the code to output a comment instead of crashing LyX (especially as the error scenario doesn't seem too rare). Locally, this document is valid DocBook 5 (as of 5f92d566).
-- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
