Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| I wonder why anyone feels offended at all.

It is the way the questions were asked, not the questions in them
selves. 

| First of all, it was Friday (or almost Friday), second, a lot of noise
| could have been prevented, if anybody would have pointed to the "false
| assumptions" and "right answers" from the beginning.
| 
| For one-not-so-deeply-involved (like me e.g.), Larry's questions have not
| been non-sensical after all. GUII might indeed look like a complete waste
| of ressources for outsiders.
| 
| Some of the answers that might have been given:
| 
| - Look at messages <.....> in the mailing list archives

This was the first answer given, and if heeded we would've probably
not needed the rest of the exchange.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to