On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 05:17:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > | All of your citation commands are still "cite" aren't they?
> > |
> > | There is little point in including natbib if you aren't going to use it!
> >
> > But... I thought that natbib redefined "cite" as well?
>
> Yes, but the point remains. You'll get the same output, whether or not you
> use natbib, so therefore don't use it. Why include unnecessary packages?
Not if the citation mode is author-year !
Even if you use numeric mode, the user might use some of natbib options
(e.g. sort) which can give different result than the standard latex \cite.
