On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:49:41PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:01:33AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Dekel> 3. We can use a different approach for saving tabulars: Take > > Dekel> for example valignment. It is only relevant for column that > > Dekel> have fixed width. > > > > Is that true? > > Yes. > > > Dekel> So for normal column we never store the valignment, and for > > Dekel> fixed with column we always store the valignment (so even if we > > Dekel> change default values in the future, it won't affect the > > Dekel> reading). Any objection to this scheme ? > > > > Is such a scheme easy to generalize to many variables? > > Here is the patch. > It doesn't rely on default values except for one case: > we assume that the default value for cell.rotate is false > (and don't tell me that in the future lyx will make all cell rotated by > default).
Looking at this patch I get the impression that still the borders of cells are always written explicitly. I think here is another "obvious default" not likely to change before hell freezes over: a cell inherits the top and bottom lines from its row, and left and right lines from its column, unless overridden by a cell attribute. Would this be hard to implement? Martin -- Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helsinki University of Technology Department of Surveying P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland :wq
msg31964/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
