> I would agree to such code, but if it is written in a safe way, that is
> not by assuming that any boolean value is false by default.
Well you surely read my mail before and I think Herbert is right in his
way. If we have the rule that only "true" values get written equal what
default value the bool has then we´re always there and also if we change
some default´s that would not change anything. In the read code we just
initialize the bool with false and if there is nothing in the fileformat
it remains false. Nothing to do with default values this is a simple rule
and could be written as comment on the start of the read function.
Isn´t it?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
