>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 01-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>> Pre2 will certainly have the documentation included. >>>> >>>> -- Lgb >> | It might work better to provide a separate tar ball for the docs >> with a | make install. At least until 1.2.final. >> >> Perhaps. >> >> Other opinions? Juergen> Yes please redo the pre1 tarball with the documentation. I Juergen> think noone will complain that a tarball changed without Juergen> changing release number, in this case. Yes, having a tarball with docs would be very nice, so that people can try it as it is supposed to be. If we want to separate docs from main download, then it would be nice to consider splitting the docs in separate language packages. It is probably possible to automatize the creation of the different translated docs. Finally, I saw someone propose that debugging info is turned off by default in pre. Do we want that? Actually, we currently test for prerelease and development versions in configure, but both get the same treatment. What things should be different between the two? JMarc