On Friday 12 July 2002 11:14 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> for (Row const * row = visible.first; true; row = row->next()) {
> // do what you want to do...
> if (row != visible.second)
> break;
> }
Glad to see that I wasn't being ridiculously stupid. Someone should refactor
Row so that list<Row> is a natural construct. Till then I thought I should
use it as it was designed to be used ;-)
> saves one "global" variable but uses 'break' which some people frown upon
> (mostly for reasons I don't accept...)
>
> Andre'
