John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>
>> why not "for (; pit != end; ++pit) {" ??
>
| Yes. (I forgot to change it after trying something else).
>
| OK with this change ?
yes.
--
Lgb
