> John Levon wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >>> Most distributions have added some "vendor patches" that fix this >>> problem. So IMHO it is a vendor problem. >>> >>> RH f.ex. does not have this problem. (and suse do have it) >> >> it's a buggy suse patch. clean 3.2 tarball is fine. I've asked >> people to report bug to suse to but nobody has said they've done so > > I just did. Nobody really said it is a SuSE bug so far, I thought it > were a gcc bug.
it is a gcc bug! rh and suse have the right patch on their ftp site. The only problem is that you have to recompile the whole gcc. Herbert -- Dr.-Ing Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
