On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:09:35AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> No. I reckon that for 1.3 you should go for the simple to code multiple
> virtual bool haveXYZ() { return true; }
> and overload the few cases in Qt where they decided that they don't want a
> dialog.
Wouldn't it even for 1.3 be simpler to have the 'name' argument and an 'if'
cascade in the Qt implementation?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
