On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 04:32:33PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Maybe I should read the code to understand your problem. I certainly
> > see \ss as proper glyph in my xforms-LyX and I enter it as
> > Compose-s-s and it is stored as a single char in the .lyx.
>
> No. You see a glyph that you entered as Compose-s-s and that is
> stored as a single char in the .lyx.
>
> If you import a LaTeX file into LyX that contains '\ss{}', you get a
> bit of ERT in LyX.
So why doesn't reLyX convert \ss{} in that single char I see in my .lyx?
> My original question seems quite clear:
> "LyX can render all except \ss well. Is this a limitation of
> insetlatexaccent, or should \ss not be such a beast?"
>
> insetlatexaccent clearly can't handle '\ss{}' at the moment, but
> no-one has answered the second part of the question. Any takers?
I think \ss{} should be stored as a single char without any accent inset or
other wrapper.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
